Meyron

Reference summary — not medical advice or a personal risk estimate.

Arsenic in drinking water

Group 1 — carcinogenic to humansFood & DrinkchemicalEvidence: sufficient_in_humans

Quick answer

Classified as Group 1 — carcinogenic to humans, based on sufficient evidence in humans. Drunk. Naturally contaminated well water in some regions (parts of Bangladesh, India, Chile, parts of the US Southwest). Public water supplies in regulated jurisdictions are tested.

Summary

Arsenic, naturally present in some groundwater, is associated with cancers of the skin, lung, bladder, and others.

Detail

Inorganic arsenic and arsenic compounds are Group 1 with sufficient evidence for cancers of the skin, lung and bladder, and limited evidence for liver, kidney and prostate. Exposure is most often from naturally contaminated well water. Public water supplies are tested in regulated jurisdictions.

What's not established

This classification is based on sufficient evidence in humans that this factor can cause cancer. It does not establish a safe exposure threshold, your personal risk, or how this factor's risk compares in size to other Group 1 agents — hazard classifications are not ranked by magnitude.

Regional relevance

global

global

Documented in these products

Presence in a product category doesn't imply the product causes cancer. Click each to see the source and context.

Evidence sources

Every claim on this page traces back to one of these. Click through to read the primary document yourself.

Primary sources

NCI

NCI — Cancer-Causing Substances in the Environment

View source →

IARC

IARC Monographs — Classifications by Cancer Site, Vols 1–140

View source →

Supporting sources

ACS

ACS — Known and Probable Human Carcinogens

View source →

EPA

US EPA — Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) carcinogen assessments

View source →

NTP

NTP — Report on Carcinogens (US National Toxicology Program)

View source →

Last reviewed: October 2026

Official reference list

A government list some readers use alongside the primary evidence. Meyron is not affiliated with it. A chemical being listed does not by itself describe a risk from any particular product.